Basil’s Blog

Black Five

Blame the 1st


Bump’s Stump

Caught Him With a Corndog

Chicago Ray’s News and Views

Christians Against Leftist Heresy

Coalition Against Illegal Immigration
buy no prescriptionvalium online without prescriptionsoma online without prescriptionklonopin online no prescriptionbuy valium no prescriptionbuy tramadol without prescriptionphentermine online without prescriptiondiazepam for saleambien online without prescriptionbuy ativan onlinebuy valium without prescription
Collecting My Thoughts

Common Cents

Creeping Sharia

Drive by Thinking


Fiery Spirited Zionist

Founding Bloggers

High Plains Pundit

Hillbilly Politics


Immigration Talk

Great Satan’s Girlfriend

Imperfect America

Intergalactic Source of Truth

Kristin’s Mishmash

Linda’s Yarn Closet

Ms Sparky

Political Melange

John Galt – Starting Over

My Voice on Wings of Change

Old Soldier

Organic Reflection

Out of Order Blog – Daletoons

Our Weapon is the Truth

Praesidium Respublicae

Pundit Press

Patriot’s Corner



Reaganite Republican 

Refugee Resettlement Watch

Religion and Politics

Ruby Slippers

Saucy American in New Zealand

Semper Fi Parents

Sharks Shakes

The Amboy Times

The Bard of Murdoch

The Born Again Americans

The Gun Report

The Path to Tyranny

The Political Commentator

The Right Way

Third World County

Thistle Patch Hill

Walls of the City

What We Think and Why

The Vail Report

The Weeping Eagle

  • Real good blog. Very informative. I really should get over here more often.

  • Gary

    Maggie, your stuff is very entertaining. Probably not for the reasons you intended but entertaining nonetheless. When it comes to race baiting you sure know your stuff! It’s kind of a theme for you huh….you’re the pot pointing at the kettle and saying “Looks black to me!”

  • The Washington Post, perhaps the most Liberal newspaper in the
    country, printed this article. It should be read by everyone prior to
    the next election. Please forward it to all of your Democrat and
    Republican friends. This is not an attempt to sway who you may vote
    for, but, it will add another dimension to being informed prior to
    casting any vote.

    Obama: The Affirmative Action President
    by Matt Patterson
    (columnist – Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

    Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as
    an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria
    akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder,
    did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into
    thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s
    most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?

    Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered
    into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores
    along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career
    as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly
    devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”) ; and finally an
    unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of
    which was devoted to his presidential ambitions. He left no academic legacy
    in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator.

    And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the
    white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s
    “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s
    colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian
    looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected

    Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz
    addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal:

    To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken
    hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like
    Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was
    black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out
    with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a
    bit extreme, he was given a pass.

    Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass — held to a lower standard —
    because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues:

    And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so
    articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all
    of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and
    thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

    Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama
    phenomenon — affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But
    certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws
    and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and
    especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

    Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on
    the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are
    not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor
    performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if
    these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the
    emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist
    policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist.

    Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his
    skin — that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism,
    then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama.

    True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why
    would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for
    Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was
    good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was
    told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the
    Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good
    enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. What
    could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time
    Obama speaks?

    In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications
    nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool
    character. Those people — conservatives included — ought now to be deeply
    embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and
    that’s when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is
    absent he can barely think or speak at all.***Not one original idea has
    ever issued from his mouth — it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that
    has failed over and over again for 100 years.*

    And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and
    everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited
    this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise
    his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But
    really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for
    anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

    In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the
    temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. *When you understand that,
    and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and
    prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in
    the Oval Office.*

  • But , and there is ALWAYS a BUT….
    Wouldn’t piss down his throat if he was standing here and IT’s guts caught Fire…

  • Steve

    GOP House Video:

    We’ve Got Your Back Small Business: