REAL ID: RFID Chips With Gold Star – Will Require More Personal Data as DHS Demands It

Just like the Jews in Germany during World War II, the REAL ID will give us all a gold star in the corner of our document (but not our arms). Don’t bother telling me it’s not the same thing. I know the history well and unlike many, I don’t forget. I also know that those majorities who do forget history doom us all to repeat it. The REAL ID Act became Public Law 109-13 in May 2005. It became law without Congress voting on the issue of instituting a “REAL ID,” but rather voting to fund our military –– “emergency” legislation. The REAL ID Act was attached to a military spending bill. Before getting into how you receive a REAL ID and what it regulates, you need to know that whatever the form your state’s REAL ID takes, it will have a “chip” in it, “machine-readable technology,” otherwise known as RFID. The REAL ID Acts takes local control of your Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to issue the driver’s license approved by the state, away and does what the federal government tells it to do. If Homeland Security can implement this law, (implementation has been set back numerous times –– but a serious push is on now) the two biggest issues, other than privacy, is your inability to enter federal buildings, nuclear sites, military installations and board commercial airlines. Can’t board a commercial airline? Now that’s serious. One other thing you need to know is that the REAL ID in no way enhances border security, lessens illegal alien crimes or illegal voting. REAL ID CANNOT be used to verify U.S. citizenship, and WILL NOT serve as a Voter ID. While a voter ID is decried as an enormous inconvenience, the REAL ID is plenty convenient, according to DHS.



The Department of Homeland Security is using the 9/11 Commission report to push this agenda, although we know many of the report’s recommendation have not been implemented. The agenda to track us is important to the government, and DHS is alleging that the REAL ID Act will prevent terrorism –– and it will all happen through their secure databases. (I’ll pause a few seconds while you drag yourself off the floor and back into your chair.)

We are told that REAL ID is not the same as a Universal ID, which has been soundly rejected by Americans.  EPIC (Electronic Privacy Information Center) has more information on REAL ID than I have found elsewhere, and what they have is in-depth.

In 2008 EPIC wrote that it supported the “Department of Homeland Security in its rejection of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology as the machine-readable technology for the REAL ID.

That was 2008.

This December 2014 EPIC document turns that around and brings us up to 2015 . . . EPIC, supported by a broad coalition, opposed the REAL ID regulations, arguing that many of the required identification techniques, such as facial recognition and RFID tags, compromise privacy and enable surveillance.

In 2007, EPIC published comments on the REAL ID Regulations. Take a look at a few of category titles:

Page 2: Americans Have Consistently Rejected a National ID System

Page 2: REAL ID is not Voluntary

Page12: REAL ID Cards Must Not Denote Citizenship Status

Page 16: DMV Workers Cannot and Should Not Become Immigration officials

Page 29: Official and Unofficial Purposes of REAL ID Must Not Be Increased

Such Federal purposes include entering Federal facilities, boarding commercial aircraft, entering nuclear power plants, and “any other purposes that the Secretary shall determine,” but the limitation on use to the three enumerated purposes are “for the time being

In other words, in the future, they can impose any restrictions they choose, and we are powerless to do anything about it.

Page 39: Regulations Would Increase National Security Threats:

The theory that REAL ID Act will prevent terrorism is predicated on the belief that only “outsiders” have an intent to harm the United States. This theory is fundamentally flawed. . . . In theory, if we know who you are, and if we have enough information about you, we can somehow predict whether you’re likely to be an evildoer,” . . .This is impossible, because you cannot predict intent based on identifications?”

And REAL ID doesn’t tell us if the ID holder is an American citizen, anyway.

Page 39-40: Centralized Identification System Increases Risk of Identity Theft

DHS stipulates that they will be the theft barrier, the wall to keep out the bad guys. All of our information will be kept in the DHS (government) database. How safe does that make you feel (oh, and it will be shared with EVERY state)?

There’s more. Read it all here. You can read the text of the “emergency” law here.

From the DHS Website in their REAL ID FAQ:

REAL ID does NOT apply to the following:

  • Entering Federal facilities that do not require a person to present identification

  • Voting or registering to vote

  • Applying for or receiving Federal benefits

  • Being licensed by a state to drive

  • Accessing Health or life preserving services (including hospitals and health clinics), law enforcement, or constitutionally protected activities (including a defendant’s access to court proceedings)

  • Participating in law enforcement proceedings or investigations

That is . . . until they change their mind. See Page 29 above.

The CATO Institute has also published frequently on REAL ID. Columnist, Jim Harper, references news stories that are misleading and incorrect. Harper sets the story straight from his point of view: Here are snippets from September 23, 2015:

. . . a report on Business Insider claims: “Residents from 5 US states could soon need a passport for a domestic flight.” The idea is that the Transportation Security Administration will begin to enforce the REAL ID Act in 2016 by denying airport access to travelers from non-compliant states.

It’s not true.

Nobody needs to get a passport to fly domestically. No state needs to implement the REAL ID Act’s national ID mandates.. . .

DHS’s latest story is that it might start to enforce REAL ID in 2016. It won’t.

Contrary to DHS claims, not one state is in compliance with the national ID law. Not one. Some years ago, the department created a whittled down “material compliance checklist,” and it has freely given out deadline extensions to states that make enough of a show that they might go along with the federal government’s plans.

The story now being spun is that TSA will categorically turn away people from a small group of remaining outlier states—if you can actually call New York small—when enforcement starts next year. I am 100% certain they will not. Every state will be out of compliance for the entire year, and the TSA will not implement a policy of refusing travelers from non-compliant states.

The reason for my confidence is a basic understanding of the politics involved. If TSA—perhaps the most despised U.S. federal agency in history—refuses people the right to travel because they do not carry a national ID, the uproar will be intense and lasting. The lawsuits that follow such an action will make their heads spin. And it will all be focused at the federal government: the TSA, the DHS, and the U.S. Congress with its flaccid oversight of the security bureaucracy.. . .

Americans, you don’t have to have a passport to fly domestically. American states, you don’t have to obey federal national ID mandates. America, you don’t need to comply with the REAL ID Act.

On that enlightening note: “America, you don’t need to comply with the REAL ID Act,” my hometown paper had a huge headline today: Oklahoma gets grace period for REAL ID. Isn’t our stinkin’ government just swell? The Tulsa World thinks so. Giving Oklahoma yet another pass as our grace period expires October 15, 2015, how magnanimous. Two Democrat Oklahoma states legislators have filed legislation to bring us into submission compliance.

In a letter dated October 5, 2015, Oklahoma U.S. Congressmen Frank Lucas (R-OK-3rd) and Tom Cole (R-4th) wrote to DHS Secretary, Jeh Johnson. Lucas and Cole acknowledge awareness that DHS “Phase 4” will begin “no earlier than January 1, 2016.” Their main concern is the ability of Oklahomans to board commercial air flights.

My bet is that both Cole and Lucas voted for the Military Funding Act, without balking, even a little bit at the addition of the REAL ID Act. I could dig into it and find their votes, but it’s more than a tad too late, and a waste of time. Too few citizens care that Congress doesn’t know what the hell they’re signing. Again, I found the link to the letter through Mike McCarville at The McCarville Report

The TulsaWorld, October 6, 2015:

A 2007 state law prohibits Oklahoma from complying with REAL ID, which means Oklahomans will have to find alternate means of identifying themselves when and if Stage 4 is implemented.

The best-known alternative is probably a U.S. or foreign passport, but the cost — $110 for most adults — and the four- to six-week waiting period is a deterrent to many people.

Cheaper and easier is the U.S. Passport Card. In addition to identification for domestic flights, it can be used to enter the United States from Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and Bermuda at land border crossings or sea ports-of-entry.

It cannot, however, be used for international air travel.

The Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles provides this qualifying information:

On each ID, the following information must be present:

  • Full legal name
  • Residential address
  • Birth date
  • Gender
  • Driver’s license/identification card number
  • Digital front-facing photograph
  • Signature

There are also new requirements put in place to obtain an ID or license; all applicants must present the following documents during the application process:

  • A photo ID, or non-photo ID that contains the applicant’s full legal name and birth date
  • Valid birth certificate
  • Social Security number
  • Proof of legal U.S. citizenship, OR proof of lawful admittance into or temporary residence within the U.S.

Lastly, each state must also agree to share its database of licensed citizens and drivers with all other states, including every piece of data on the cards themselves (name, address, birth date, etc.), along with all driving records and driver histories of everyone licensed to drive in the state.


Whatever my state, or any other state decides, having a real ID (in the true sense of the word ‘real’), as in voter ID, will be left up to the states. My state requires voter identification, but not a photo ID. Any state not requiring a signature, photo and proof of citizenship to vote brings an appalling problem onto the shoulders of its citizenry. States make the laws in this matter, and that’s the way it should be, but when the safest way to protect the vote is considered “unfriendly” and a “burden,” and “partisan,” but the same state allows REAL ID –– well, we know your agenda, don’t we?

Like an “unfriendly” border wall, we will forego our sovereignty in the name of “friends,” just as we do every day in the U.S. Congress when our legislators refer to their “friends across the aisle.” Those times have passed. American sovereignty has no friends across the aisle.

We funded the military, and like magic we had a law that many in Congress didn’t know about, or pay attention too, because, afterall, we can’t not fund the military. We can’t shutdown the government, so Congress ignored the reality of REAL ID and didn’t start paying attention until two years later. As is often the case, the attention they paid is worth nothing. If CATO is right, and states needn’t bother because the means to implemention is impossible, it’s just one more thing that Congress doesn’t know.

One last thought. The REAL ID is for American citizens and those allowed in this country legally. At one time in our recent history, citizenship was required to receive a driver’s license in most states, and such DLs were given to those not citizens but here legally. Today, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, Utah, Washington, and Washington, DC give driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. These states and D.C. have an illegal migrant population of more than FOUR MILLION combined. Maybe one up-side of REAL ID will be that all illegals will leave my state and flood into these friendly states.

According to the DHS, 70%-80% of all states now have driver’s licenses in compliance with REAL ID. Scroll back up, about mid-way to my really big headline –– they can do anything they want to do, because we let them do it. We have no Defending Fathers.

If you have time, please vote in my presidential poll, top of this page on your right.

If you would like to receive Maggie’s Notebook daily posts direct to your inbox, no ads, no spam, EVER, enter your email address in the box below.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 957 other subscribers

  • Xavier

    Maggie, something I’d like to point out about RFID is that it is a passive technology. It operates something like sonar and something like the bar code scanner at your grocery store; when radio frequency waves (the RF in RFID) bounce off the chip, it bounces back data. RFID doesn’t need a battery, and they can be placed almost anywhere. You, your car, your kids, your food, your purchases, your phone, anything that can contain a tiny RFID chip can be scanned without your knowledge or consent.

    • Xavier, can facial or retinal recognition be added to RFID? EPIC appears to believe this is part of the program (maybe not in Phase 4) at a later date. And how would we know. They’ve left the door open to demand whatever they want.

      • Xavier

        I have never heard of combining it with facial or retinal recognition software. RFID could be used automatically at stoplights to register that your car was there or for the police to scan your car and DL prior to a stop – or just to check you out without your knowledge. As far as I know, it requires a special chip that responds to the RF scan.

    • Xavier, one other thing I didn’t mention is the mind-blowing costs behind this. The last estimates I could find were 2008. Imagine adding more information to cards already in place and think of the $$$$$$$.

      • Xavier

        Where I see this going is nano, or nearly nano. If chips are small enough and cheap enough, they’ll be in literally everything. You’ll be scanned dozens of times a day, just as you’re photographed now at stoplights and when entering stores and banks. But instead of just a picture, enormous amounts of personal data will be available.

        • Xavier, I see it too, and in my opinion, it began with Newt Gingrich (I really like him) and his push to get our medical records online.

  • Rick Lakehomer

    It is just in the details……………komrades.

  • Ken

    This is just frightening. The most frightening is the apathy of the population of this country. I have discussed this so many times with so many people and I’m told that there is no such thing, no such law. It scares me that we are going to fall so easily, like the Jews of WW2, only because of our ignorance. I gotta go, the new XBOX is on sale….

    • Ken, we elect our officials to know these things. We pay them to know these things. It no longer works. All the promises to post legislation on line for a certain number of days, so that we can do their job for them –– never happens. If anyone reads, it’s the staffers, and if we assume they did read, the only they cared about was not upsetting voters with a government shutdown. Watch that XBOX. I understand subliminals come through in every game.

      Oh, as to no such law, it is ‘contained’ in Public Law. There is a Public Law number attached to it. Most states now are onboard. Weren’t in the beginning, but with perseverence, they’ve brought most to heel. Notice that CATO says they will never be able to implement it because the infrastructure isn’t there.

  • ScottyK

    I was going to make a comment about Oklahoma not in compliance with REAL ID, but you mentioned it in your article. Very good. Also greetings to a fellow Okie! Now to take care of the RFID chip, will 10 seconds in the microwave be enough?

    • ScottyK, my hubby gave me the article in the TulsaWorld. I can’t stand to read that paper, but he likes the Sports section. Greetings right back to you, and I think the microwave will work, great idea, but you still couldn’t get on a commercial flight.

  • Pingback: REAL ID: RFID Chips With Gold Star – Will Require More Personal Data as DHS Demands It | Grumpy Opinions()

  • Pingback: REAL ID: RFID Chips With Gold Star – Will Require More Personal Data as DHS Demands It | Viewpoints of a Sagitarrian()

  • cryandhowl

    Maggie, I got my a$$ blistered for posting something about the RFID chip a long time ago. Regardless of the harmless perception of this thing, know of a certainty there’s danger nearby.

    • cryandhowl, It’s the beginning and the information they will start with, they should not have. They haven’t been able to get Universal ID through, this will turn into Universal ID.

  • Fixall

    “Big Brother” is here. I fear for this country,and there is no representation in D. C. for us.

  • dianabug

    6 6 6 The mark of the beast – you will not be able to buy or sell without it.