Islamic Women Declared Un-Islamic By Islamic Council: Mere Existance Contradicts Will of Allah

This story comes from Pakistan Today and if I didn’t know Islam to be what it is, I wouldn’t believe it. Maybe this is the Pakistani version of The Onion. CORRECTION AND EDIT: Yes, it is apparently NOT TRUE. I saw it on several reputable websites. My apologies. I’ll leave it here for your amusement, because I have no doubt that if some “Islamic Council” could do this, they would do this. Note that the photo, as I orginially said, is unrelated, but it is still a photo. IT IS NOT TRUE. MY APOLOGIES (minus the photo and the comment under it): The story about child marriages, about half way down, links to “The Express Tribune with the International New York Times.” This is the story of Marvi Memon and child marriages, . I believe this is true. Chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani is involved in both stories. He believes Pakistan’s laws “restricting” child marriage are unIslamic. AGAIN: My apologies.

The supposed caption is "Muslim Girls in Chains Being Led to Marry." I haven't found the original source of the photo. I'm crediting it to IsraPundit as that's where I found it first. If the girls are being led to marry, THEY ARE CHAINED AND SHROUDED.

The supposed-caption is “Muslim Girls in Chains Being Led to Marry.” I haven’t found the original source of the photo, nor do I know the country of origin. I’m crediting it to The Patriot, as that seems to be the earliest dated report

If the young girls in the photo above are not being led in chains to marry, they ARE BEING LED IN CHAINS. Note the difference in size between the ‘chained’ and the big sisters on each side. I wonder if those two have the slightest ache in their heart for these little ones? I wonder if they go on an auction block?

Islamabad – Sharia Correspondent: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting on Thursday [convened on March 10, 2014] with the ruling that women are un-Islamic and that their mere existence contradicted Sharia and the will of Allah. As the meeting concluded CII Chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani noted that women by existing defied the laws of nature, and to protect Islam and the Sharia women should be forced to stop existing as soon as possible. The announcement comes a couple of days after CII’s 191st meeting where they dubbed laws related to minimum marriage age to be un-Islamic.

The above is eerily similar to what Elliot Rodger, the Isla Vista, California shooter said in his manifesto. See the manifesto ‘cliff notes’ here.

After declaring women to be un-Islamic, Shirani explained that there were actually two kinds of women – haraam and makrooh. “We can divide all women in the world into two distinct categories: those who are haraam and those who are makrooh. Now the difference between haraam and makrooh is that the former is categorically forbidden while the latter is really really disliked,” Shirani said.

He further went on to explain how the women around the world can ensure that they get promoted to being makrooh, from just being downright haraam. “Any woman that exercises her will is haraam, absolutely haraam, and is conspiring against Islam and the Ummah, whereas those women who are totally subservient can reach the status of being makrooh. Such is the generosity of our ideology and such is the endeavour of Muslim men like us who are the true torchbearers of gender equality,” the CII chairman added. Read more here, March 15, 2014.

The meeting also affirmed that once puberty is reached, a girl is ready to marry and it is “un-Islamic” to see it any other way. Chairman Maulana Muhammad

Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani

Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani

Khan Shirani quoted Article 2, 7 and 227 of Pakistan’s Constitution, along with verses from the Koran and Hadith saying that when a girl attains puberty, [life as a girl is over for her] the sick fun for Muslim men may begin. Pakistan adopted the Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929, which says that a male under 18 and a female under 16 cannot be married-off. A “minor” means a person of either sex who is under 18 years of age. If a male older than 18 marries a “child, he can go to prison for one month and/or be fined “one thousand rupees.” Not much “restraint” in that law.

If a parent contracts their ineligible-by-law child to marriage, the parent or guardian may also be jailed for one month and/or fined one thousand rupees.” There are other indiscernable provisions — eyes glazing over. It appears the “Restraint” of marrying a young girl is a joke. Read it here. 

Marvi Memon

Marvi Memon

Marvi Memon is a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan. She introduced legislation, along with others, attempting to amend the Council of Islamic Ideology’s (CII) “Act.”  She is an attorney and the daughter of a prominent politician, educator and businessman. From what I read in the “Restraint” Act, there is no “restraint” and she and others are fighting a losing battle, but at least they are doing something. Feminists and Liberals in the U.S. could at least speak about it, as conservatives, both men and women do, but they remain silent, including Barack and Michelle Obama who both think Islam is just swell.

The Patriot (Britain):

Notice the contrast in views between the Creator of the Universe revealed in Genesis and Allah. Our Creator created Adam as male and female. He took one side of His creation, Adam, and formed the first woman by His own Will. This is in sharp contrast to Allah – the existence of women is against the will of Allah. Amazingly enough, there are some who attempt to claim that Allah is the same as the Creator that is expressed in Torah – even though the 2 are in sharp disagreement on so many points.

This type of emotional suffering around the world is incomprehensible, especially for women and children (although boys are routinely abused) — and none of it is the fault of the United States of America.

For a related story of the evils of Islam, and what human beings have the heart to do, read about Umar Mulinde.

If you would like to receive Maggie’s Notebook daily posts direct to your inbox, no ads, no spam, EVER, enter your email address in the box below.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 957 other subscribers

  • Norma Brown

    gad, I hope there aren’t 72 of those covered up and chained girls; I hope they weren’t going to actually kill them to go along with some worthy male recently deceased…

    • Norma Brown, isn’t that just ghastly?

    • Larry

      THE JEWISH RABBI WHO CREATED ISLAM

      ISLAM WAS FINANCED & CONTROLLED BY ARABIAN JEWS FROM ITS BEGINNING, TO BUILD AN ARMY TO FIGHT THE ROMAN EMPIRE.

      Intro: [ABU BAKR WAS A JEWISH RABBI]

      Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great
      affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl ( A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:
      The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous;
      this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his
      terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

      HISTORY OF PALESTINE

      614-1096 C.E.

      From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

      By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850

  • When you click the source link on the Pakistan Today article (which you really should have linked to yourself but it was not that hard to find) you will see the actual source is Khabaristan Today, a series of obviously bogus and satirical articles. The story about women being declared non-Islamic is not true. You have been trolled. Please edit your article to reflect that fact.

    • Kenneth J. DeVries, I did see Khabaristan Today but it didn’t look like a link. I think you’re right, and I began by saying it was perhaps another “Onion-type” article, but saw it so many places, including at least two very reputable sites. Thanks.

    • Sara

      That was rude Kenneth J. DeVries.

    • Larry

      BUGGING YOUR WIFE?

      Distortion committed by Bukhari whilst copying down a tradition in his ‘Sahih’ pertaining to the legitimacy of sodomy

      We read in the Holy Quran:

      Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth
      when or how ye will (Yusufali, 2:223).

      In various Sunni works we read that testimony of Abdullah Ibn Umar regarding the reason for the revelation of the said verse qua legitimacy of performing buggery on one’s wife. Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuuti for example recorded in Tafseer Durre Manthur, Volume 1 page 638:

      وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني
      في الأوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال‏:‏ إنما نزلت
      على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏{‏نساؤكم حرث لكم‏.‏‏.‏‏.‏‏}‏ الآية‏.‏ رخصة في
      إتيان الدبر‏.‏

      Hasan bin Sufiyan in his Musnad, Tabarani in Al-Awsat, Hakim and Abu Naeem in Al-Mastakhraj with a ‘Hasan’ chain of narration narrated from Ibn Umar who said: ‘This verse was revealed upon the Holy Prophet (s) in respect of the permissibility of performing sex in the anus of a woman’

      Curiously, when it came to the great Imam Bukhari, he felt compelled to record the statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar in an incomplete manner. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50:

      Narrated Nafi’: Whenever Ibn ‘Umar recited the Qur’an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur’an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, “Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? ” I replied, “No.” He said, “It was revealed in such-and-such connection.” Ibn ‘Umar then
      resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:–”So go to your tilth when or how you will” Ibn ‘Umar said, “It means one should approach his wife in ..”

      ‘In’ what? Of course IN her anus and whilst Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuti and other famed Sunni scholars recorded this fact, it was Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani who filled in the blanks whilst commenting on the cited tradition of Bukhari:

      في إتيان المرأة في دبرها

      “Approach the woman in her anus”

      Fatah ul Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8 page 190

      Imam Bukhari has recorded this tradition in his ‘Sahih’ with the following chain of narration:

      Ishaq (bin Rehwiya) – Nadar – Ibn Aun – Nnaf’i

      Now the most interesting part is that Bukhari actually copied down the above statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar from his Shaykh, namely Ishaq bin Rehwiya as mentioned by Ibn Hajar Asqalani:

      فقد أخرجها إسحاق ابن راهويه في مسنده
      وفي تفسيره بالإسناد المذكور ، وقال بدل قوله حتى انتهى إلى مكان ” حتى انتهى إلى
      قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فأتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم فقال : أتدرون فيما أنزلت هذه الآية ؟
      قلت لا . قال : نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن

      Ishaq bin Raheweh recorded it in his Musnad and his Tafsir
      with the same chain, when it reached the part “your wives
      are tilth to you, so go to your tilth anyhow you will” he said: ‘Do you know what for this verse has been revealed about?’ They said: ‘No’. He replied: ‘It has been revealed in regards to approaching women in their anuses’

      Interestingly whilst citing the said tradition verbatim Bukhari committed deception and did not quote the words of his Shaykh opting to leave a blank, in the hope that the attention plan of his readers would be short enough to confuse them and direct them to the next narration.

  • John Guest

    Don’t quote me, but I was told that picture is a re-enactment of the Shia being led off to slavery or whatever by the Sunni following the Battle of Karbala. The story is it’s part of ritual celebrations involving the “Mourning of Muharram.”

  • REDJI

    A Cult of Death is all I see…..

    • Larry

      YO REDJI, but did uou know who created it?

      THE JEWISH RABBI WHO CREATED ISLAM

      ISLAM WAS FINANCED & CONTROLLED BY ARABIAN JEWS FROM ITS BEGINNING, TO BUILD AN ARMY TO FIGHT THE ROMAN EMPIRE.

      Intro: [ABU BAKR WAS A JEWISH RABBI]

      Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great
      affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl
      ( A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:

      The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous;
      this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his
      terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

      HISTORY OF PALESTINE

      614-1096 C.E.

      From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

      By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850

  • Pingback: Islamic Women Declared Un-Islamic By Islamic Council: Mere Existance Contradicts Will of Allah | Grumpy Opinions()

  • cryandhowl

    Hey Maggie! No need to apologize, and as far as I’m concerned you don’t have to “edit” anything. Anyone who’s half awake realizes what women are according to Islam … property, like unto cattle.
    BTW, love your little history lesson.

  • Sara

    I hope you didn’t get it from me. I fell for it – just deleted it but you took a good approach. Is it really that fantastical? 🙁

  • Pingback: The Daley Gator | Your Weekend Link-A-Round()