Would staffers for the Justices serving on the U.S. Supreme Court hide pleadings, documents and remove cases from “the electronic docket?” That’s what is alleged in the story below. The short story: five Justices did not receive documents and could not have taken part in a conference to dismiss the case. The case and the plaintiffs, Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606, revolves around Barack Obama’s natural born status and other issues of fraud. No matter what you think about these claims, once taken to the Supremes, the Supremes should decide what they will consider and/or hear and what they will not consider and/or hear. According to the attorney, this is about “treason.”
U.S. Supreme Court Building
Pullout Quote:
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back, Â as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental briefwith information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin.  She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Supplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Attorney Orly Taitz has sent a letter to Congressman Goodlatte (R-VA) stating:
The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon†by court employees with unknown allegiance.
We have SCOTUS clerks functioning as “the decider?” If this is true, we need a class action suit against SCOTUS, by all American citizens against whomever is involved. There is no mention of which Justices did not receive the pleadings, etc. Could they be Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy? Someone should start a pool, you know, like those office football-thingeys.We’d all win.
 Linked at BadBlue – the baddest news on the planet!
Where is Congress? How about the Supreme court Judges who DID NOR recieve? What is happening to our country?
What is happening INDEEED!!!
Kathleen and Miles Jory, with the way Orly Taitz is treated, I hope she has around-the-clock security.
Maggie recently posted..Gov Bought 2B Rounds of Ammo in 10 Months: Homeland Security Armed for 24 Years at War Level
[...] Virginia Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) is a special guy on Wikipedia with a special political afffiliation as a “hypocrite.” In the space where Goodlatte’s political party would normally show “Republican,” the word “hypocrite” appears in red lettering. My screenshot from about 2;15 pm CDT, February 18, 2013 is below. More on Goodlatte here in a story about SCOTUS staffers hiding documents and pleadings from Justices as well as removing cases from the dock… [...]
[...] SCOTUS: Staffers Hide Pleadings, Docs from Justices – Remove Dockets? 5 of 9 Justices Get Nada? [...]
Just a few days ago I went to http://www.orlytailzesq.com website. Now it is not there. Where is she and what is happening? This is totally scary! Have you talked to her? Has anyone else picked up this story? What can we do?
Arlie, this site http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ is up. She also has a new FB page, http://facebook.com/dr.orly.taitz
I think she’s okay.
Maggie recently posted..Gov Bought 2B Rounds of Ammo in 10 Months: Homeland Security Armed for 24 Years at War Level
That is certainly disturbing!
proof recently posted..Ever Wish Obama Paid as Much Attention to the Economy as His Golf Game?
Proof, I think this is the most disturbing story I’ve found in all the years I’ve been blogging.
Maggie recently posted..Gov Bought 2B Rounds of Ammo in 10 Months: Homeland Security Armed for 24 Years at War Level
I thought the Benghazi cover up was bad, but since this deals with the bona fides of the one who is covering up Benghazi, AND possible corruption in the Supreme Court, it may well be the most disturbing story any of us have seen in years.
proof recently posted..Quote du jour
If this story is true, it is indeed treason and must be investigated to the end.
Jim at Asylum Watch recently posted..The CFR Wants You To Pay More For Gasoline
Please keep up the fearless reporting. This truly is a disaster. The Supreme court corrupted we are all through. WTF is wrong with congress why are they not looking into anything going on with this administration.
[...] Goodlatte was contacted by his constitutent, attorney Orly Taitz who notified him that someone inside the U.S. Supreme Court was failing to hand-over pleadings and other documents to five… I hope Rep. Goodlatte will get into that story in a big way, and he should demand a public apology [...]
i find this hard to believe and no word if another date is set if the judges did not get the info on case how did a court be set 2-15-13 then 2-19-13 to give reply on the case this makes no sence