Florida Jews Blacklisted From Obama Synagogue Campaign Event: Rabbi David Steinheart B’nai Torah Not So Egalitarian

Rabbi David Steinheart’s B’nai Torah synagogue in Boca Raton, Florida is a House of Worship, a House of Study and a House of Gathering, according to the website. The “Gathering,” however is not “House” wide if you oppose Barack Obama. The synagogue welcomed US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice to the building when she wanted to make a case for how supportive Obama is of Israel, which has legs only if you are illiterate. Many in this South Palm beach community don’t see Obama as embracing Israel in the traditional American embrace, so when Obama asked long-time supporter Steinheart to hold a “campaign event,” and Steinheart agreed, some were shocked to find their names on a blacklist due to their opposition to Obama. The evening of the “event,” standing in the rain, they were turned away from the synagogue – the House of Worship, the House of Study, the House of Gathering.

Rabbi David Steinheart

B’nai Torah says it is affiliated with the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism (USCJ). The USCJ seems mainly involved with the experience of “Israel.”  The USCJ Yeshiva in Israel is the focus of the organization, and the website says: “We are a vibrant, open-minded, egalitarian community of committed Jews who learn and practice and grow together.”

egalitarian: asserting, resulting from, or characterized by belief in the equality of all people, especially in political, economic, or social life. Source Dictionary.com

egalitarianism: a belief in human equality especially with respect to social, political, and economic affairs and a social philosophy advocating the removal of inequalities among people. Source Merriam Webster

Steinheart says the synagogue supports Conservative/Masorti Judaism, which goes back to the USCJ mentioned above. Steinheart says his congregation “inspires social action.” What he did not say is that not supporting Barack Obama is an unacceptable “social action”

Masorti Rabbis apparently are considered “non-Orthodox,” and that tid-bit is probably not significant in this story, except that a commenter at Israel Matzav says Steinheart is “about as much of rabbi as a mechanic is a nuclear scientist or an engineer is a surgeon.” So, there’s that. I can’t vouch for the truth of it.

Can you imagine a Protestant church in America holding a “campaign event” inside the church and turning away people, including members, who disagree? I hope I live to see the day when churches routinely do hold political events on church property, but turning people away should never be acceptable unless and until there is major disruption to the point that speakers cannot be heard, or near violence ensues (example: jihad).

In the video, you will hear three prominent Democrats say that “we” (United States) do not accept the legitimacy of settlement activity.” Consider this:

Do you support Israel’s right to exist? Assuming that your answer is probably “yes,” how do you feel about Israel’s “occupation” of the lands granted at statehood and those “retrieved” in the Six Days War? Perhaps your answer is “everything would be much easier if Israel were not an “occupier,” but still…you support Israel’s right to exist.

Are you a bit queasy about Israel’s “disproportionate response” to Palestinian aggressions; aggressions which include years of firing thousands of rockets and mortars into Israeli border towns?

You probably acknowledge that Hamas should not be digging tunnels under the border into Israel…kidnapping Israeli soldiers, secreting arms through those tunnels from Egypt and Iran… to use on Israel, but still…Israel has a fearsome military, and after all, Gaza is a terribly poor area, filled to bursting with refugees existing for years in loathsome refugee camps – and don’t forget that Gaza is historically Palestinian – you might say. You support Israel’s right to exist, but still…it would be so much easier if the poor and oppressed of Palestine were not the victims of Israeli military.

Everything in the Middle East tends to be complicated, but some things can be understood by the Western mind. Here are a few facts that should ease your mind about “Israel the occupier:” continue reading here after watching the appalling video below.

My disclaimer: I know little about the differences between the various segments of Judaism, and cannot truthfully say that I have explained the kind of synagogue Steinheart pastors – meaning the Conservative/Masorti, so perhaps my friend findalis at Monkey in the Middle will stop by and set me straight if I got it wrong.

Rabbi David Steinheart, B’Nai Torah, Boca Raton Blacklists Political Opposition to Barack Obama (video)

Linked at BadBluethe baaadddest news on the planet!

Linked at Doug Ross and Larwyn’s Linx – The Wages of Liberalism – thank you!

  • First of all Rabbi David Steinheart is not in control of the synagogue. There is a Temple committee that if they do not support the Rabbi and his actions can fire him. If this synagogue’s committee believes this, then Rabbi Steinheart will be looking for a new job.

    But Conservative Jews who used to be actual Conservatives, have been taken over by liberal. In fact, they are dying out due to their liberal, anti-Israel views. Reform Jews are also dying out for this reason and Progressive Judaism is so far to the left that the idea of circumcision should be banned. They are not Jews.

    The members of the Congregation of B’Nai Torah who are too upset at Rabbi Steinheart and are not on the Temple committee will take their membership dues and find another synagogue. If enough members leave, the synagogue will either fire the Rabbi or close their doors.

    • ali3nation

      So what if the rabbi does not have the ultimate word in the politics of the synagogue. So there is a board of directors that controls him. The end result was that opposing political viewpoints were forcibly excluded. You can spin this anyway you like but it is a recipe for disaster.

      • A) Findalis isn’t “spinning” anything and,
        B) You’ve just repeated the message. Hmmm…
        Maybe espresso in the a.m. would help?

        The phenomena of “emancipated” Reform and Conservative Jewish movements are almost uniquely North American. (The Conservative Movement, as of 1985 had at least five distinct internal schools, including the ultra-left-wing Reconstructionists.)

        In the rest of the world many different traditional Orthodox schools and general customs (i.e. Sepharad and Ashkenaz) thrive and continue, with the two “liberal” American streams *mostly* understood by the rest as heretical. (…Save the right-wing “conservadox” school, as it were, of American Conservative that still holds by Shabbat, dietary laws, t’fillin & tallit, etc. – it appears just not a whole lot of them around these days.)

        • Reform Judaism started emerged in Germany in the 1880’s. It was a way to make Judaism more “appealing” to the non-Jewish world and for Jews to “experience” Judaism without having to follow the Law.

          Reform Judaism in Germany didn’t last long. In 1928 the executive board governing German Reform Judaism issued a paper suggesting that Jews become more like Christians to “assimilate” better into German society. 10 years later was Kristallnacht. 20 years later they were decimated.

          Reform and Conservative Judaism is the reason that Jews have assimilated into society, and have given up their faith.

  • ali3nation

    One thing I never could understand about the holocaust was how the Jewish people let it happen. I mean, why didn’t they do something ( don’t ask me what ) to try to overthrow Hitler, or defend themselves. I just couldn’t accept that they did nothing to try to save themselves from the impending horror. Now I think I see exactly what must have happened. This video is truly nauseating, to see that woman telling another member of the congregation that she will have to get a no trespassing order against him and seeing the county sheriff expel that congregant from the synagogue explains it all. Beware people, that horror is rearing its profane head again here in the USA. Stop it now before it consumes all of us.

    • Yipes. Thanks, but beware certain falsehoods: Jews did nothing. Just “let it happen.” Didn’t “defend themselves.”

      First off, understand the Nazi holocaust took *mostly* non-Jewish victims, about 6 of every 10. (Jews made a plurality of about 40%.) A lot of people – Jews and Gentiles – tried and a lot of people were killed resisting and fleeing, before and during. The Romani (Gypsies) were particularly vulnerable and were damned near wiped-out of Europe.

      . . .

      You make good points about the Temple trespass issue: If I was the ejected congregant, there would be punitive libel and similar suits brought against the temple and the woman.