In the past few days while I’ve been busy with readying for Christmas, news has broken that the latest treaty devised by the bunch of anti-Semitics at the latest Durban summit includes an International Climate Court which will charge all nations except third world countries. According to the conversation in the video below, the U.S. will be expected to pay 2% of our GDP, 2% on every financial transaction, along with taxes on air travel, and fuel. This is the United Nations Millennium Development Goal (UNMDG) transferred to Durban. Before you tell me that this will never happen, that the treaty will not be signed, remember that Barack Obama has worked toward this plan since he was in the U.S. Senate. This is who your president is. It’s a big deal.
The following is from one of my numerous, previous posts on the mission of the UNMDG:
All quotes are taken directly from the U.N. Millennium Goal Forum (MDG) minutes. For the purpose of this story skip to No. 8 (but don’t miss 1-7), and if you visit the link in the previous sentence, you’ll also see this:
3. To move towards creation of alternative revenue sources for the United Nations. The United Nations should set up expert groups and begin the necessary intergovernmental negotiations towards establishing alternative revenue sources, which could include fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions (i.e., the Tobin Tax) and a tax on the carbon content of fuels.
1] Abolishing war through a worldwide freeze on militaries and achieving global disarmament:”
To initiate a worldwide freeze on armed forces
…the prohibition of the use of force,…must not be undermined
To explore the feasibility of a legally binding convention on overcoming poverty,…To carry out the objective of moving towards the abolition of war by practical means,…the United Nations Secretariat and interested Governments, or a separate group of Governments, should develop a draft proposal for global disarmament
2] Prohibiting advanced weapons technology
…devise ways of stopping the technological development of new and more advanced weapons that create new imbalances in global power relationships.
3] Monitoring small arms
4] Controlling the world’s immigration to allow for:
…the global principle of freedom of circulation for all
5] Controlling the world’s finances:
…To move towards democratic political control of the global economy so that it may serve our vision.
…Sustainable funds could be raised through a currency transfer tax…and a tax on the rental value of land and natural resources.
6] Controlling the world:
Globalization needs defining [and then they define it].…it is transforming our world into a global village…
7] Prohibiting “sanctions” against rogue countries:
…Stop imposing economic sanctions…
8] Controlling conservation through a global tax:
…establish a global habitat conservation fund to purchase comprehensive protection of threatened, critical ecological habitat worldwide. The fund should accrue revenues from a nominal (0.5 -1.0 per cent) royalty on worldwide fossil energy production oil, natural gas, coal, collecting at least $5 billion to $10 billion annually.
But…but…U.S. Congressmen Pete Stark (D-CA) proposed H.R. 5783 in 2010 to tax all currency transactions to benefit “children, global health and climate change mitigation.” Oh, and to fight HIV/AIDS. Californians must be so incredibly proud. The legislation was proposed in the 111th Congress, with no action and is now dead.
The link to my previous post is here, but note that along with the UNMDG, I was also talking about then-Senator Barack Obama’s Global Poverty Act (S.2433), which is now dead. His bill, had it become law, would have tied us to the USMDG.
In the video below, Alex Jones from InfoWars is talking to Christopher Monckton, also known as Lord Monckton. In 2009, Monckton talking about the 2009 UN Climate Change Conference, said this:
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” — because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of
this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
In the video, Monckton says there are no more references to “government,” and there is discussion on the state of ClimateGate today.