Fast and Furious: “Significant Confidentiality Interests” Claimed by White House

The White House released documents on September 30th showing ATF Phoenix Manager Bill Newell had on going email and telephone communications with White House National Security then- staffer Kevin O’Reilly. Some records were not turned over by the White House, claiming “significant confidentiality interests.” With hundreds of murders attributed to Fast and Furious, including the death of Border Security Agent Brian Terry, someone needs to know what the “confidentiality interests are?” “Confidentiality interests” = Executive Privilege, yet the White House still says they had no knowledge of weapons being illegally walked into Mexico.

Although some of the emails are just reported today, on July 27th, 2011 we learned of 1 of 2 emails from Newell to O’Reilly that began with “you didn’t get these from me.” Newell has said O’Reilly, a longtime friend, asked for the information,  and earlier said “I shouldn’t have been sending that to him.” Today we know that “that” is much more than two emails.

About the “significant confidentiality interests:”

A lawyer for the White House wrote Congressional investigators: “none of the communications between ATF and the White House revealed the investigative law enforcement tactics at issue in your inquiry, let alone any decision to allow guns to ‘walk.'”

In other words, documents showing White House culpability will never be released.

CBS News – read the full story here:

Among the documents produced: an email in which ATF’s Newell sent the White House’s O’Reilly an “arrow chart reflecting the ultimate destination of firearms we intercepted and/or where the guns ended up.” The chart shows arrows leading from Arizona to destinations all over Mexico.

In response, O’Reilly wrote on Sept. 3, 2010 “The arrow chart is really interesting – and – no surprise – implies at least that different (Drug Trafficking Organizations) in Mexico have very different and geographically distinct networks in the US for acquiring guns. Did last year’s TX effort develop a similar graphic?”

Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) have asked to interview Kevin O’Reilly but have been told he is on assignment in Iraq.

Hot Air – Ed Morrissey:

This is rather amusing.  Three years ago, a Democratic House sued to get Karl Rove and Harriet Miers to testify over the termination of US Attorneys, who are political appointments that serve at the pleasure of the President, and rejected the notion that executive privilege applied to such executive-branch personnel decisions.  Now we have an ATF operation that armed drug cartels and resulted in hundreds of murders from guns supplied by the US government, including the murder of a Border Patrol agent here in the US — and Democrats think that should be covered by executive privilege.

Thanks to Musings of a Mad Conservative for the graphic


  • Isn’t there a single journalist in the country that wants to be the next Woodward or Bernstein?

  • significant confidentiality interests my arse. It is cover-up pure and simple and the Republicans sit on their collective butts to busy trying to figure out how to stop gays from joining the military or getting married or too busy posturing for re-election that they won’t do anything. This mess will come back and bite the GOP in the butt if they do not put forth total effort to bring this to light. They need to do as the Dems did as you mentioned in o your post, SUE HOLDER, the DOJ. the POTUS, Nappy and the DHS, ATF, DEA until they get every single shred of evidence needed to lock up the whole dang bunch who are without a doubt complicit in the death of the young Border Patrol Agent.

    I am not going to hold my breath for the Republican’s to do anything more than hold hearing so they can try to fool the American people into believing them when they say “I TRIED”.

    Tried ain’t good enough, GET IT ON AND GET IT DONE!

  • Pingback: Sunday Links: 80′s Horror Edition » Conservative Hideout 2.0()

  • It’s sort of like taking the 5th, isn’t it? Barry wouldn’t want to incriminate himself.

  • Pingback: Teeing it up: A Round at the LINKs | SENTRY JOURNAL()

  • Why aren’t the Republicans standing up every day and demanding an independent investigation of this?

    The O’Reilly thing is no surprise. He balances his political views to maximize his viewer audience.

  • Silverfiddle, wrong O’Reilly. It’s Kevin, a White House staffer, no Bill, the talking head.

  • Do Obama and Holder belong in the Grey Bar Hotel, or what

  • IS

    “and Democrats think that should be covered by executive privilege”

    We all know good and well that if Bush had been involved, the dims would be screeching that all information being shared between the White House and others responsible for letting these guns walk should be immediately revealed. They would initiate legal means to get it done too. How ironic.

  • Ran

    OH, Ducky.

    Thanks Maggie! (I’m just returned from a week’s nutty schedule.) “Significant interests” indeed…


    Thanks! I’ll do the links thing tomorrow. Cheers!


  • Pingback: GunGate: Operation GunRunner / Fast & Furious / GunWalker / Castaway – CONTINUOUS ROUND-UP « Si Vis Pacem()

  • Pingback: Eric Holder Briefed on Fast and Furious July 2010 | Maggie's Notebook()

  • Helga

    This is the first time I have heard of this post and I think this is really awesome…

  • Zia

    Well for me, this is really great and perfect to share to other people too…