Sarasota Saudi Family 9/11/01 Connection: Abdulazzi al-Hiijjii Disappeared – Esam Ghazzawi Disappeared: FBI – No Connection to 9/11/01

Abdulazzi al-Hiijjii (maybe Abdulaziz) and his wife Anoud lived in a Sarasota, Florida house owned by her father, Esam Ghazzawi until they the three fled back to Saudia Arabia two weeks before the 9/11/01 attacks. The house, located in the gated-community of Prestancia, was left with three vehicles in the garage and driveway – each recently registered. Fruit was left on the counter top, food in the fridge and toys in the pool. Larry Berberich, a senior administrator and security office at Prestancia reported strange events connected to the family, including visits and phone calls from 9/11 attackers to al-Hiijjii. The report prompted an investigation that was never reported to Congress.

Esam Ghazzawi Home (middle with white roof)

The day of the attacks President George Bush was visiting a Sarasota school. Larry Berberich was with the Sarasota County sheriff’s contingent that day. He alerted the sheriff to suspicions he had when the news of the attacks broke. A neighbor of al-Hiijjii sent a email to the FBI on the day of the attacks. FBI agents showed up immediately and asked for financial information on the property at 4224 Escondito Circle in Prestancia.

Berberich and a senior counterterrorism agent said they were able to get into the abandoned house, ultimately finding “there was mail on the table, dirty diapers in one of the bathrooms … all the toiletries still in place … all their clothes hanging in the closet … TVs … opulent furniture, equal or greater in value than the house … the pool running, with toys in it.”


“The beds were made … fruit on the counter … the refrigerator full of food. … It was like they went grocery shopping. Like they went out to a movie. … (But) the safe was open in the master bedroom, with nothing in it, not a paper clip. … A computer was still there. A computer plug in another room, and the line still there. Looked like they’d taken (another) computer and left the cord.”

The counterterrorism officer, who requested his name not be disclosed, said agents went on to make troubling discoveries: Phone records and the Prestancia gate records linked the house on Escondito Circle to the hijackers.

In addition, three of the four future hijackers had lived in Venice — just 10 miles from the house — for much of the year before 9/11. Atta, the leader, and his companion Marwan al-Shehhi, had been learning to fly small airplanes at Huffman Aviation, a flight school on the edge of the runway at Venice Municipal Airport…

The counterterrorism agent said records of incoming and outgoing calls made at the Escondito house were obtained from the phone company under subpoena.

Agents were able to conduct a link analysis, a system of tracking calls based on dates, times and length of conversations — finding the Escondito calls dating back more than a year, “lined up with the known suspects.”

The links were not just to Atta and his hijack pilots, the agent said, but to 11 other terrorist suspects, including Walid al-Shehhri, one of the men who flew with Atta on the first plane to strike the World Trade Center.

Another was Adnan Shukrijumah, a former Miramar, Fla., resident identified as having been with Atta in the spring of 2001. Shukrijumah is still at large and is on the FBI’s Most Wanted list.

But it was the gate records at the Prestancia development that produced the most telltale information.

People who arrived by car had to give their names and the home’s address they were visiting. Gate staff would sometimes ask to see a driver’s license and note the name, Berberich said. More importantly, he added, the license plates of cars pulling through the gate were photographed.

Atta is known to have used variations of his name, but the license plate of the car he owned was on record.

The vehicle and name information on Atta and Jarrah fit that of drivers entering Prestancia on their way to visit the home at 4224 Escondito Circle, said Berberich and the counterterrorism officer.

The al-Hiijjiis fled the U.S. from Arlington, Virginia with Esram Ghazzawi departing Dulles and Heathrow to Riyadh. Ghazzawi was on an FBI watch list. His wife Deborah is American-born, and there is no news that she left has left the U.S., but both had postal records in Saudi Arabia. Ghazzawi reportedly owned or owns many properties in the U.S.

The FBI later tried to get Ghazzawi back to the U.S. for the sale of the Sarasota property. That didn’t work. He had papers notarized in Riyhad, but his wife’s signature was notarized in Riverside Country California in 2003. When did she leave the U.S.? Did the FBI care? There is a Deborah Ghazzawi on Twitter as dgcupcake, and there is at least one Saudi connection follower there. There is a Deborah Ghazzawi announcing the opening of a nail salon and spa in al-Khobar, one of the couple’s postal locations, in 2006. Phil Warner has more on differing social security numbers,  name spellings and birth dates. 

The fact is the Bush administration is believed to have covered up the investigation, bypassing Congress to keep from embarrassing Saudi Arabia or because Saudi warned him to not pursue it. Scary to think about.

Much of the information on this house, the residents, the owners and the investigation has been chronicled and reported by Dan Christensen at the BrowardBulldog, ending with this latest news: the FBI says neither the Hiijjiis nor the Ghazzawis have a connection to the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks. 


Posted by Maggie @ Maggie’s Notebook 


  • “The fact is the Bush administration is believed to have covered up the investigation, bypassing Congress to keep from embarrassing Saudi Arabia or because Saudi warned him to not pursue it. Scary to think about.”

    A fact (derived from the Latin Factum,) is something that has really occurred or is actually the case.

    So there is NO FACT, just speculation. Because it is believed does not make it a fact since there is no proof that it actually occurred. In a court of law it is called hearsay and is inadmissible as evidence except in some instances of juvenile court law cases. Illinois has such in their Juvenile Law as does a few other states. No where that I can find in criminal or even in civil cases is hearsay admissible as evidence except in the example that I give below. First to address Federal law. Rule 104 of FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE is clear in this matter. Also Federal Rules of Evidence 801(d)(2)(a), a statement made by a defendant is only admissible as evidence if it is inculpatory; exculpatory statements made to an investigator are hearsay and therefore may not be admitted as evidence in court, unless the defendant testifies.

    In other cases and example would be: Susan told me Tom was in town” as her evidence to the fact that Tom was in town. Since witness does not offer in this statement the personal knowledge of the fact, this witness statement would be hearsay evidence to the fact that Tom was in town, and not admissible. Only when Susan testifies herself in the current judicial proceeding that she saw Tom in town, the Susan’s testimony becomes admissible evidence to the fact that Tom was in town.
    Note this next section:
    However, a witness statement “Susan told me Tom was in town” can be admissible as evidence in the case against Susan when she is accused of spreading defamatory rumors about Tom, because now witness has personal knowledge of the fact that Susan said (i.e. pronounced the words) “Tom was in town” in presence of the witness.

    Now since NO PERSONAL knowledge of the statement is or has been forthcoming it is not a fact, it is pure hearsay and not admissible.
    It only took me one court case to learn this so it would seem that whoever came up with this statement would learn this as well. Oh, I am sure they know that it is not a FACT but they just like to use the word to grab the attention of those who are ignorant of the FACTS.
    End of lesson on Laws of Evidence for today. Class dismissed.

    • Yes, I should have said, “it appears”….based on the FACT that Congress had no knowledge of the investigation. Notice however, that I said “the fact that the Bush administration is BELIEVED to have covered up,” pretty much explained what I was saying.

      We have three branches of government. We should use them, and when Congress disabuses their power, we should act upon it, just as we should with the Executive branch.

  • Hello there, just was alert to your weblog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I?m gonna be careful for brussels. I?ll appreciate should you continue this in future. A lot of other folks can be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve take note your stuff prior to and you are just too excellent. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re saying and the way in which through which you assert it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to stay it sensible. I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is actually a terrific website.