Recently I did a story about girl scouts, and their cookies AND their pledge to contact politicians to encourage the promotion of “emissions-reducing” legislation. That was, in my opinion, an astonishing story, but not nearly as astonishing as reading that the Girls Scouts hosted, at the United Nations, an “adults not welcome” panel, and allowed Planned Parenthood to distribute a brochure titled Happy, Healthy and Hot. Among other information to make the children “hot,” is the council to masturbate and talk dirty to your private parts.
The brochure is geared toward children with HIV, nevertheless they want your child to participate, and offers the comforting news that requiring a person to notify a sex partner of their HIV staus violates their rights.
Is it time to ask what is going on in the Girl Scouts? I think so. From where has this drastic turnaround come from? Who thinks this is okay? The Other McCain has the answer and it reminds of “lesbians” and “Thin Mints. Danged depressing.
The Girl Scouts, along with the YWCA have been co-moderating a young women’s caucus that included an “Intergenerational Conversation” side event on “universal access” and “reproductive health.” One recent Girl Scout project “aims at securing the right of women, men and adolescents aged between ten and twenty-five, to better reproductive and sexual health.”
This story from the New York Times says conservative groups mainly from the U.S. have objected to the graphic material and the lack of calling for children to seek guidance from parents. As a result, UNESCO has asked that their name be removed from the project until the publication can be made more “effective and adaptable” by country. In otherwords, the children in Africa may need one thing – children in the U.S. another. As the project stands now, children are also encouraged to advocate for abortion.
UNESCO has spent $350,000 trying to come up with the text of how to make children healthy, happy and hot. They are not pleased with conservatives and their objections.
The guidelines suggest, for example, that teachers begin discussing masturbation with children ages 5 to 8, with a more extensive discussion for those ages 9 to 12.
More from the Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute linked above:
The brochure [distributed by Planned Parenthood] is aimed at young people living with HIV, contains explicit and graphic details on sex, as well as the promotion of casual sex in many forms. The brochure claims, “Many people think sex is just about vaginal or anal intercourse… But, there are lots of different ways to have sex and lots of different types of sex. There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!”
The brochure goes on to encourage young people to “Improve your sex life by getting to know your own body. Play with yourself! Masturbation is a great way to find out more about your body and what you find sexually stimulating. Mix things up by using different kinds of touch from very soft to hard. Talk about or act out your fantasies. Talk dirty to them.”
Apparently the parents of Girl Scouts are outraged by the Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute’s report. Read their follow-up here:
The Girl Scouts have flatly denied that the sex guide was available at their UN conference. We stand by our story and based on new evidence we go further. The sex guide was distributed with the full knowledge and consent of the Girl Scouts-USA.
Theres more: Note to Parents: the National Education Association (NEA) wants your children to masturbate and the NEA has an LGBT “trainer of trainers” program to teach about LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgenders). Are you aware of this?
Pundette has more to say about the NEA with links to others, and Stacy McCain reveals that the Planned Parenthood brochure designed for those from ages 10 to 25 have 20 full pages of guidance for your kids, and suggests a camping trip with Charlie Sheen may be in the works.
Is it your goal that your Girl Scout be “hot,” and push a green agenda? By the way, that pledge I mentioned above didn’t last long before it was removed from the website. Perhaps a boycott of Girl Scout cookies was feared. This likely has everything to do with radicals…probably feminists – mostly old hippy-types leering around our children – peace, love and emission-reducing legislation. Probably some child predators as well – in fact it’s guaranteed if the U.N. and/or the U.N. Women’s Initiative is involved. What better way to serve the pervert market than to sexualize our children?