The deplorably consistent, seldom conservative, Senator Lindsay Graham is back on the amnesty bandwagon. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Graham (R-SC) have been drafting legislation for the president for months, and yesterday they trekked to the White House to get the latest marching orders. No matter the legislation penned, we have Congress damning the Rule of Law, and perhaps Tea Parties will take this up next. See the cost of illegal aliens in the U.S. from the Heritage Foundation, $89.1 billion ANNUALLY (below), and weep for our country.
(thanks to Hyscience)
The president had some thoughts about what “a path toward citizenship for 10.8 million people” already in the U.S. illegally, should look like:
The basis of a bill would include a path toward citizenship for the 10.8 million people living in the U.S. illegally. Citizenship would not be granted lightly, the White House said. Undocumented workers would need to register, pay taxes and pay a penalty for violating the law. Failure to comply might result in deportation.
For laughable starters, consider the “failure to comply MIGHT result in deportation.” Just a small indication of the lack of will for serious reform.
The good news is Schumer says Graham is the only Republican support he has found, and he needs a second Republican as co-sponsor for the
legislation illegal legislation.
Remember when Senator Tom Coburn entered an amendment to uphold the enforcement of EXISTING immigation laws? Nineteen Republicans voted AGAINST respecting the Rule of Law. The amendment language was simple and straight-forward.
To require the enforcement of existing border security and immigrations laws and Congressional approval before amnesty can be granted.
Senator John McCain didn’t show up for that vote. Senator Graham voted against it. At the same time, Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced the following amendment:
“…permanently bar from the U.S. and from receiving any immigation benefit: suspected terrorists, gang members, sex offenders, felony drunk drivers, and other individuals who are a danger to society.
Cornyn’s amendment was defeated with the help of 10 Republicans voting against enforcing the Rule of Law.
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has a program known as Operation Predator, which hunts child predators across the U.S. In a document dated January 25, 2008, this statistic jumps out: 85% of the arrests made as part of Operation Predator have been arrests of non-citizen sex offenders….”
Think of the impact enforcing the Rule of Law would have had on the lives of thousands of children and families. In their first four years, ICE arrested 10,700 child predators. That means 9,095 of those children were the victims of illegal aliens.
Our children remain victims of both illegal immigrant predators and well as the the financial burdens to families who must pay the cost of illegals. From The Heritage Foundation:
Of all adult high school dropouts, legal and illegal, in America:
25% are legal immigrants and
9% are native-born Americans.
The U.S. Government, funded by U.S. citizens, pays out an average of
$30,160.00 per legal and illegal household with heads-of-households
lacking a high school diploma.
The $30,160.00-average paid represents social security benefits and
Medicare, police, public safety, transportation, administrative support,
public education and other means-tested aid.
“Means-tested aid came to $10,428 per household, while direct benefits
(mainly Social Security and Medicare) amounted to $4,891. Education
spending on behalf of these households averaged $8,462 per household,
while spending on police, fire, and public safety came to $2,746 per
household. Transportation added another $809, and administrative support
services cost $1,195. Miscellaneous population-based services added a
Okay, you are saying…but these people pay taxes, yeah, but only about $10,500.00:
In return for handing-out $30,000.00+ per legal and illegal household,
we receive from such households, a payment average of $10,573.00 in
taxes. These paid-in taxes include federal highway taxes, unemployment
insurance and workers compensation taxes, federal excise taxes and
customs duties, state individual income tax, STATE LOTTERY PURCHASES (an
average of $714.00 per household!), corporate income tax, state and
local property taxes, federal individual income taxes, state and local
sales and comsumption taxes and FICA “contributions.” View this in Chart
3 of The Heritage Foundation Report.
In addition to the $30,000+ hand-out from American citizens, it is
estimated there are 1.6 workers per legal and illegal, unskilled
household, each averaging $18,490 in earnings. This is an average of
$29,584.00 annually in earnings, plus the $30,000+ courtesy of citizens.
View this in Table
2 of The Heritage Foundation report.
Of course, there’s always a bottom-line and, in this case, it is the
deficit in dollars incurred to you and me. For each household, we say
adios to an average of $19,588.00. View this in Chart
5 of The Heritage Foundation report.
The “net lifetime cost,” according to the Heritage Foundation is this:
“Receiving, on average, $19,588 more in immediate benefits than they pay
in taxes each year, low-skill immigrant households impose substantial
long-term costs on the U.S. taxpayer.
Assuming an average 60-year adult
life span for heads of household, the average lifetime costs to the
taxpayer will be nearly $1.2 million for each low-skill household, net
of any taxes paid.
This calculation assumes that a low-skill immigrant comes to the U.S. in
his mid-twenties with a spouse and that both remain in the U.S. for an
average of 60 years.
Even if low-skill immigrants return home rather
than remain in the U.S. permanently, thereby reducing costs, this
argument merely underscores how costly low-skill immigrants are to the
U.S. taxpayer. The less time these immigrants spend in the U.S., the
lower the cost to the taxpayer.
Moreover, most current immigration
reform proposals  would grant legal status to illegal immigrants,
increasing their access to welfare and Social Security. These proposals
would substantially increase the time that these immigrants remain in
From one of my previous posts:
$19,588.00 x 4.54 MILLION such households is a total of $89.1 billion –
$89.1 billion we give away, annually, to non-citizen, and
knowing-lawbreakers. In addition:
“Over the next ten years,
the net cost (benefits minus taxes) to the taxpayer of all low-skill
immigrant households will approach one trillion dollars.”
The Heritage Foundation, in Chart
7, shows that each and every age bracket RECEIVES far more than it
PAYS IN, but as the households age, the deficit increases.
“There are currently 8 million non-elderly adult immigrants in low-skill
immigrant households. Assuming normal mortality rates, perhaps 7
million of these individuals will live to age 67. After reaching age
67, the normal life expectancy would be approximately 18 years. With an
average net cost of roughly $270,000 over 18 years, the net future
retirement costs of the 7 million low-skill immigrants would be around
“…low-skill households are net tax consumers even during their working
years. It is important to note, these families are rarely idle; they
consistently work and pay taxes. However, the taxes they pay are seldom,
if ever, sufficient to cover the cost of the government benefits they
In consequence, these households must be continually subsidized
by other taxpayers.
Low-skill immigrants are among these problematic households. On average,
they are a net fiscal burden throughout their working years, and after
retirement they become an even greater tax burden.
Politicians should be
wary of any policy that will increase the future number of net tax
consumers. Immigration policy, in particular, should be focused on
increasing the number of positive taxpayers and reducing the future
number of tax consumers.”
According to the Heritage Foundation, the idea that illegals “contribute to the solvency of Social Security” is untrue. With all government benefits, these households “ten dollars in total government benefits for each dollar they pay in Social Security taxes.”
Of the current push for legislation before the distraction of mid-term elections, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala) said the things he hears “from the administration won’t be well received,” and the above from the Heritage Foundation should be a clear reminder of why American should strongly reject the idea of amnesty for illegals, no matter how the legislation is written.
Another battleground for conservatives. If amnesty is next, than the Rule of Law in this country is deader than dead.
Linked by The Lonely Conservative – Loose Ends – Dr.Evil Edition