Dalia Mogahed is the Obama administration’s Muslim Affairs adviser. She is a part of the President’s Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Mogahed appeared on a British television show, Muslimah Dilemma, hosted by Ibitihal Bsis on the Islam Channel. Bsis is a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir. I want to know that taxpayer money did not transport her to London or pay for her hotel and food. The TelegraphUK put it this way: Mogahed is the first “veiled woman” to serve in the White House.
Hizb ut Tahrir just tried to hold a “Caliphate Planning Conference” at an Islamic school in Bridgeview, Illinois. Dubbed Hizb ut-Tahrir America (HTA), the program was “designed to support the establishment of a Caliphate” in America. The event was cancelled. Hizb ut-Tahrir means “The Islamic Liberation Party.”
The Hizb ut-Tahrir is an extremist group. The group refuses to “take part in any political system except that based on Islam and the Sharia.” Is Dalia Mogahed a card carrying member of Hizb ut-Tahrir? How will we ever know the truth? Do you think if asked, she would deny that she does not want an Islamic Caliphate in America? She can lie about it. The Koran encourages Muslims lie to infidels.
Mogahed spent about 45 minutes with the “host” and the organization’s National Women’s Officer, Nazreen Nawaz:
During the 45-minute discussion, on the Islam Channel programme Muslimah Dilemma earlier this week, the two members of the group made repeated attacks on secular “man-made law” and the West’s “lethal
cocktail of liberty and capitalism”.
They called for Sharia Law to be “the source of legislation” and
said that women should not be “permitted to hold a position of
leadership in government”.
Miss Mogahed made no challenge to these demands and said that “promiscuity”and the “breakdown of traditional values” were what Muslims admired least about the West.
She said: “I think the reason so many women support Sharia is because
they have a very different understanding of sharia than the common
perception in Western media.
“The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance.
Robert Spencer at JihadWatch explained “gender justice:”
Here’s some gender justice straight out of the Koran, the Islamic holy
book that forms the basis of Sharia. As I explain in my book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran, the Koran declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” (2:282). It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children’s
(inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females”
Worst of all, the Koran tells husbands to beat their disobedient wives, saying that “men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other,” and that therefore “good women are the obedient.” And as for those who are not obedient, the Koran directs men to give them a warning, send them to a separate bed, and “beat them” (4:34). It also allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” (65:4).
The question is: why do we have a devout Muslim serving in any position in the White House when her/his deepest desire is to have Sharia Law govern the U.S. There is nothing constitutional about Sharia Law being represented from inside the White House.
The Nobel Peace Prize committee gushed that Obama had reached out to Muslims. When will the Muslim world reach out to us? When will jihad be extinguished. When will Muslims take jihad out of their holy houses? Never is the answer. Let’s get this woman out of the White House and demand there be no replacement.