We were shocked when radio shock-jock and conservative talker, Michael Savage’s name appeared on a list of persons banned from entry into Britain last Spring. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith sees Savage’s political viewpoint offensive. More shocking was that Savage’s name was announced on British television…even though he had not applied for entry into the country. The bottom-line is, Savage is a banned Jew in Britain, simply to balance the list for Muslims.
Through the British Freedom of Information legislation, and a $162,000 lawsuit Savage filed against Smith, official correspondence has revealed the real reason Michael Savage’s name was so publicly bandied-about by the Smith who has recently stepped down from the post for using taxpayer money to pay her husband’s porn bill. Family Security Matters quotes Smith characterizing Savage as:
…someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country.
Savage’s real name is Michael Weiner, and because he makes some national noise against the Islamification of the West, and because he is Jewish, the Brits thought the name “Weiner” would look good on their list of bad people, and as one email said:
“with Weiner,…the decision [to add his name] would help provide a balance of types of exclusion cases.”
On Home Office stationary:
We will want to ensure that the names disclosed reflect the broad range of cases and are not all Islamic extremists. Otherwise the exercise could play into the hands of radicals who allege falsely that the unacceptable behaviours policy is targeted specifically at the Muslim community.
A document marked ‘Restricted’ said:
“We will want to ensure that the names disclosed reflect the broad range of cases and are not all Islamic extremists.’
An email confirming the decision was made at the highest level of Government:
“HO [Home Office] intend to include Weiner in their quarterly stats…Both the FS [Foreign Secretary] and PM [Prime Minister’ are firmly behind listing and naming such people.”
Another said that the Home Office could be accused of duplicity without a good excuse for naming Savage, but added that him being “homophobic does help.”
Silly Savage. He originally thought Smith defamed him because he is “controversial and white.” Now that his lawsuit brought the documents to light, he says this:
Make no mistake about this – they ‘chose’ me because I am the only talker in the top five who is Jewish! The old anti-Semitic strain has resurfaced in England, not among the right wing, but on the socialist left. This should galvanize every member of the U.S. media, but will it?”
Smith told the British people that the world needed to “understand the sorts of values and sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it’s a privilege to come, and the sort of things that mean you won’t be welcome in this country…if you can’t live by the rules that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should exclude you.” Ironic in light of these photos which are one just small example of the conduct of Muslims in London:
Those of us who follow Michael Savage and the Savage Nation knew the banning was due to him being someone deplorable to Britain’s new protected species, the Muslims. Just as the Left in the U.S. covets the Muslim vote, so they do also in Britain.
We were right but we should have expected the Jewish angle. Banning Jews in the West? Friends these are dangerous times.